In his 43-page order, Justice Milind Jadhav observed that if a company approaches the court for closure of its establishment on the ground of accumulated losses as per the law, the possibility of unemployment of the workers can't be a ground to compel the company to run its business and refuse closure. "The accumulated losses in the present case are substantial. They pan out over almost a decade prior to the closure announced by the company.
from Auto-Industry-Economic Times https://ift.tt/24RM0pT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Maruti Suzuki announces price protection for small cars booked till June 14
Maruti Suzuki India is offering price protection on its small car range until June 14, 2026. This initiative aims to shield entry-level buye...
-
Mahindra, in collaboration with Warner Bros. Discovery, has launched the limited-run BE 6 Batman Edition electric SUV, inspired by Christoph...
-
At present, the carmaker has tied up with 20 partners across vehicle needs, mobility services and lifestyle companies to offer exclusive ben...
-
PUBG Mobile developer has expressed concern and surprise over the recent ban and arrest of 10 college students in Rajkot, Gujarat, for playi...
No comments:
Post a Comment